Does Your Lease Contain Unenforceable Penalties?

Does Your Lease Contain Unenforceable Penalties?

Some residents violate their leases.  Over the years, we have seen many frustrated landlords attempt to coerce lease compliance by imposing penalties on residents for lease violations.  Types of penalties for lease violations are endless.  Some of the more common penalties are for having a pet, failing to pick up after a pet, making excessive noise, smoking, or violating parking restrictions.  For example, a typical lease penalty provides that the resident has to pay the landlord $100 if the resident smokes in his unit in violation of the lease.

Imposing penalties on residents for lease violations may seem like a good solution to force compliance and eliminate annoying and reoccurring problems.  However, your lease should not contain any penalties because penalties are not enforceable under Colorado law.  Many areas of the law are unclear, but the unenforceability of penalties is not one of them.  Since statehood, Colorado courts have consistently held that the law abhors forfeitures.  Because penalties are forfeitures, Colorado courts will not enforce any lease provision found to be a penalty.

Penalties are not enforceable, but liquidated damage provisions are enforceable.  However, the mere use of the words “liquidated damages” is not conclusive, and courts will scrutinize any liquidated damage lease provision to determine if it is a penalty.  In determining whether a provision is a valid liquidated damages provision or an unenforceable penalty, courts will look at three factors.  One, whether the parties intended to liquidate damages.  Two, at the time the lease is signed, whether the liquidated damages are reasonable estimate of your actual damages.  Three, at the time the lease is signed, whether it is difficult to ascertain the amount of actual damages that would result from a breach.  If  your lease fails to meet any of these tests, the provision is an unenforceable penalty.

Your probably thinking that your lease provisions easily meets these three tests.  However, analysis of the common penalty provision for noise illustrates that the analysis is more complicated than you think.  A typical provision provides that “Resident will be penalized (fined) $50 for excessive noise.”

In support of his case, the landlord would make the following arguments.  One, the resident signed the lease so the resident agreed that we “intended to liquidate damages”.  Two, if the resident makes excessive noise, the community is going to lose other residents, and a $50 fine is very reasonable compared to the lost revenue resulting from lost residents.  Three, if the resident makes noise, we don’t know how many residents will move out, so the communities actual damages are difficult to predict.  While these arguments sound good, the courts will not find them persuasive.

The landlord in our example has sunk his own boat by use of the word penalty.  If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck.  If a lease provision uses the word penalty, the landlord’s intent is clear.  The provision is a “penalty”, and not a defensible liquidated damages provision.  Damage provisions are intended to make you whole in the event the resident breaches the lease.  Penalty provisions are intended to compel performance.  When the lease uses the word penalty and the penalty has no rationale relationship to actual damages, landlord’s intent is to compel performance of the lease rather than to provide a mechanism to determine damages for breach of the lease.

For those of you not convinced, let’s evaluate landlord’s position further.  Remember, landlord’s position is that the $50 noise penalty is reasonable (meets the 2nd test) because it pales in comparison to landlord’s actual losses if the noise persists (lost revenue from several residents who move out).  However, landlord’s logic is flawed because the test is whether the amount is a “reasonable estimate of landlord’s actual damages” at the time the lease is signed.  Landlord doesn’t know what his damages will be at the time the lease is signed if a resident makes excessive noise and drives off other residents.  However, landlord does know that his damages will be much greater than $50.  Therefore, the $50 penalty is not a reasonable estimate of landlord’s actual damages, and only further shows that the provision is intended to compel performance, and not to compensate for breach.  Accordingly, the $50 penalty is unenforceable.

Some clients may be thinking, “we impose penalties, and have never had a problem”.  If clients gave me a nickel for every time they told me that something was in their lease and they have never had a problem with it, the girls’ college education would be paid.  Just because you have never had a problem, doesn’t mean you won’t have one in the future.  If you have a penalty provision in  your lease, you are sitting on a keg of gun powder that eventually will be ignited.  Its not question of if, but when.

The fuse may be lit when you try to evict a tenant for not paying a penalty.  Specifically, you penalize the resident.  The resident doesn’t pay, and you attempt to evict the resident for failing to pay the penalty.  The court rules that your penalty provision is unenforceable.  You lose the case.  As the losing party, you have to pay the resident’s attorneys’ fees. Oh, did I mention that the resident hired Mr. Four Hundred A Hour as their attorney.  In attempting to collect your $50 noise penalty, you just got clocked for $5,000 in attorneys fees.  The resident broadcasts the results both in the building and on the internet.  Now you have multiple other residents taking shots at you.  If you decide not to enforce the penalty lease provision against residents who resist, you have just traded one problem for another.  Now you have a fair housing problem.

Under Colorado law, if residents are not complying with their lease, your remedy is to serve them with a demand for compliance or possession, not to penalize them.  For example, if the resident is making excessive noise, you serve a compliance demand that states “stop making excessive noise within three days or get out”.   Of course, some residents will make noise, and then fly right when you serve the demand, only to make noise later.  Fortunately, Colorado eviction law gives you the tools you need to deal with repeat offenders.  If a resident makes noise, flies right after service of a demand, and then makes noise again,  you can serve a three day notice to quit for a repeat violation, and the resident must vacate, or the court will evict them.  

Penalties are not enforceable.  Carefully thought out and well drafted liquidated damage clauses are enforceable.  Courts almost always will find any 

lease provision that uses the words “penalty” or “fine” is an unenforceable penalty. While the use of the word penalty will almost always sink you, the use of the expression “liquidated damages” won’t necessarily save you.  Because the law abhors a forfeiture, courts will heavily scrutinize liquidated damage provisions.  If your lease language is ambiguous, courts always construe the lease against you.  Liquidated damage provisions have their use but only in limited situations, and drafting a provision that meets the legal test is challenging.  Rather than attempting to be clever and trying to disguise a penalty as a liquidated damage provision, your much better off not having penalties, and enforcing your lease through the legal service of non-compliance demands.

Eviction Resources & Education

We have over 20 years of experience in handling eviction cases. Let us share our knowledge with you.

Posts
Does Your Lease Contain Unenforceable Penalties?
Confronting Emotional Support Animal Fraud
Answers to Questions About House Bill 1121
Why do I have an eviction judgment on my record and what do I do about it?
NEW HUD ANIMAL GUIDELINES DISAPPOINTINGLY MISS TARGET
What to Do When a Tenant Requests a Mail Delivery Accommodation
Information for Tenants Regarding Your Eviction Case
FREQUENT QUESTIONS ABOUT COLORADO'S NEW LANDLORD TENANT LAWS
TO CHARGE OR NOT TO CHARGE? THAT IS THE QUESTION! SHOULD YOUR DAMAGE CHARGES BE PRO-RATED
NEW LAWS REQUIRE LANDLORDS TO ANALYZE TENANT COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
THE BIG TAKEAWAYS FROM THE 2019 LEGISLATIVE SESSION LANDLORDS NEED TO GET PREPARED
NEW EVICTION LAW DEMANDS YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
SUBPOENA OVERVIEW
New Legal Requirements For Tenant Applications - You Should Start Preparing Now
"Slip and Fall' AT THE RENTAL PROPERTY, WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP?
JANUARY IS A GOOD TIME TO REVIEW YOUR SNOW VENDOR CONTRACT
MAKE SURE THAT YOUR TEXTING PROGRAMS ARE LEGALLY COMPLIANT
SNOW REMOVAL CONTRACTS CAN CAUSE LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROVIDERS
NEW COLORADO LAW CREATES STRICT LIABILITY FOR SECURITY BREACHES OF TENANT PERSONAL INFORMATION
HOW YOU CAN REDUCE POTENTIAL DAMAGE CLAIMS FROM AMENITIES
COLORADO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING UNCLAIMED SECURITY DEPOSITS
THE WAR OVER EVICTION (CREDIT) RECORDS IS ESCALATING
WHERE CAN ASSISTANCE ANIMALS GO?
New Law: REQUIRES Copies of Leases and Receipts for Rent
DEALING WITH CHRONIC COMPLAINING TENANTS REQUIRES YOU TO BE PREPARED
Dog Bites Are On The Rise - What You Need To Know
HOW TO DEAL WITH AND AVOID SURPRISE GARAGE PROBLEMS
SMALL CLAIMS LAWSUITS REVISTED - YOU NEED TO KNOW YOUR OPTIONS & DEADLINES
NEW LAW STANDARD FORMS DEFINED BY COLORADO
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PASSES LAW SUPPLEMENTING RIGHTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS
UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE FHA AND THE ADA
LANDLORDS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LAW
AVOID EVICTION ISSUES BY UNDERSTANDING SUBSTANTIAL VIOLATIONS
MOVE-OUT STATEMENTS - ISSUES & ANSWERS
ENTRY AND ACCESS ISSUES - IT'S ALL ABOUT YOUR LEASE
TENANTS, LANDLORDS, AND GUNS
STUCK IN THE MIDDLE: MANAGING DISPUTES BETWEEN TENANTS
FEDERAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAW REQUIRES SOUND POLICIES
REQUESTS BY THIRD PARTIES FOR TENANT INFORMATION OR ENTRY TO THEIR UNIT
ARE YOU READY WHEN THE MAN COMES AROUND? FAIR HOUSING TESTERS ARE COMING
EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL (ESA) ABUSE CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH COMMITMENT
OCCUPANCY STANDARDS ARE UNDER ATTACK - YOU MAY NEED TO ADJUST YOUR POLICY
COLORADO'S NEWLY PASSED SERVICE ANIMAL LAW A GOOD IDEA POORLY EXECUTED
HANDLING TENANT DEMANDS FOR SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUNDS
HUD CRIMINAL SCREENING GUIDANCE - COMPLICATED AND PROBLEMATIC
WHAT IS IN A NAME? A LOT MORE THAN PEOPLE REALIZE
RENEWAL POLICIES REDUCE EXPOSURE AND STRENGTHEN YOUR DEFENSE AGAINST FAIR HOUSING DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS
FAIR HOUSING POLICIES THE BEST LINE OF DEFENSE
DON'T GET SNOWED BY MR. PLOW
TENANTS FILE MORE AND MORE SMALL CLAIMS COURT LAWSUITS - YOU NEED TO KNOW YOUR OPTIONS
HOA Fair Housing Update: Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity/ Expression Are A Protected Class In
REVIEWING YOUR RENEWAL PROCESS AND LETTERS CAN AVOID HEADACHES
TIPS FOR DEALING WITH PROSPECTIVE RESIDENTS
ASSISTIVE ANIMALS YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, WE HAVE ANSWERS
SUPREME COURT INCREASES POTENTIAL FOR FAIR HOUSING LIABILITY - DISPARATE IMPACT
IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE, SOMEBODY IS WATCHING YOU! ADOPT POLICIES TO AVOID PUBLIC RELATIONS NIGHTMARE
MONEY ORDERS - CONVENIENT BUT PROBLEMATIC WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
DISASTERS HAPPEN PRE-PLANNING AND LEASE PROVISIONS ARE A NECESSITY
PAY ATTENTION TO NAMES TO AVOID PROBLEMS AND LEGAL NAME REQUIREMENTS
WHO ARE THESE GUYS AND WHY DO WE HAVE TO PAY THEM?
SOMEBODY HAS TO PAY - OR DO THEY?
Minimize Your Risk In Turning Units: Make Sure All the Staff Are Proficient On Abandonment Issues
Companion Animals, Part III: You Have To Be All In To Handle Companion Animal Requests
Companion Animals, Part II: The Problems with Current Legal Standards
Companion Animals, Part I: An Issue Now More Than Ever
That's A Substantial Violation! Or Is It!
Will You Pass? When Fair Housing Testers Come
Domestic Violence: Time For A Refresher
Marijuana: You've Got Questions, We've Got Answers
Know Your Renter's Insurance Policies and Follow Your Review Protocols
Identifying and Eliminating Waiver Problems
Fair Housing Issues: A Slip of the Tongue Can Cost You
Senior Discounts: Not Worth the Risk
New Domestic Violence Law Impacts Your Rights
Military Resident Rights: The Law and Your Rights
Liability For Vicious Dogs
Companion Animals: An Evolving Area of the Law (Part 2)
Companion Animals: An Evolving Area of the Law (Part 1)
Retaliation Under the Fair Housing Act: Proceed Cautiously - Don't Make A Bad Situation Worse
When A Tenant Moves Out - Part 1
Cars: A Tenant's Tale (Abandoned Vehicles)
Changes To Real Estate Laws (Enforcement) May Affect You
Disabled Resident Requests: Handling Them Takes Skill
Disability Modifications: Who Foots the Bill?
Restrictions on Service and Companion Animals: Are They Allowed?
Caregiver Parking Requests: Yet Another Twist
Bringing In A Hired Gun: The Pitfalls of Hiring Armed Security
Medical Marijuana: A Fair Housing Accommodation???
Fair Housing Policies - Are You Covered?
Restraining Orders: What You Need To Know
To Restore or Not To Restore - When Can You Require Residents To Restore Modifications
Don't Ignore Criminal Activity - Inform Residents
Be Prepared When A Resident Discriminates Against Another Resident
Do Leasing Offices and Model Apartments Have To Be Handicap Accessible?
Exceptions To Policies, Services or Practices: Uncommon Requests for Reasonable Accommodations
Online Payments Can Affect Your Evictions
Economics Should Determine Security Deposit Decisions
Dealing With Pesky Small Claims Court Lawsuits
Secondhand Smoke: A Problem That Defies a Solution
Vendor Contracts: Traps For the Unsuspecting?
evictions

Eviction Resources & Education

Our firm offers invaluable tools and guidance to empower landlords and property managers. Access expert insights, detailed eviction forms, and educational resources to navigate eviction proceedings with confidence. Trust TSM Law to equip you with the knowledge and resources needed for successful property management.

Become a Client 
of Tschetter Sulzer Muccio Law Firm

Register now

Contact us

Tschetter Sulzer Muccio P.C.
Copyright 2025 Tschetter Sulzer Muccio Law
magnifiercross